Wednesday, May 1, 2019

What do you consider to be the main differences between a unitarist Essay

What do you consider to be the main differences amongst a unitarist and pluralist approach to the counselling of the collective employment relationship - Essay ExampleUnitarist and Pluralist in the management of collective employment relationships.The unitary approach to management is where there is an integrated and harmonious entity that subsists for common purposes (William & Smith, 2006). This speculation portrays the employer and employee relationship to be sensation where there is harmony and understanding. The main assumption of this system is that there ar a common set of values and these bind the devil parties, i.e. the employer and the employee together. Also these ensure that there are no conflicts among the two parties. This is one of the oldest theories that have been developed to describe employment relationship however it is one which clearly and very smoothly connects to the contemporary methods as well. These include the ideas related to the corporate culture and forgiving resources management. However there are a number of drawbacks of this theory as well. Firstly, it fails to recognise the difference in the midst of the interests of the managements and those of the employees. The theory only assumes that all in all decisions made by managers is in the interest of the employees. There is a overlook of good communication in this theory and including bettered communication is the only mode of explaining the countervailing force in all cases including, individuals, groups and even trade unions. Also as explained by Palmer (1983), where conflicts arise, the conflicts should be resolved by dismissing the employee or with the racket of law.Although the Unitarian theory was available, with the growing come of complexity and the increased scales of business units, there was a unvoiced need for a theory to be developed to be stronger in nature than that of the Unitarian theory. This theory required being able to accept that there are alw ays a limited amount of conflicts that are present in an organisation and this needed to be a mode of achieving a consensus among the two parties, i.e. the

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.